You are here
Opinions
Date | Judge | Topic | Subtopic(s) | Title | Case Number |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
09/29/2011 | Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure Provisions | Rule 7012, sufficiency of complaint | In re Morris (Federal Ins Co v Morris) | 11-6049 | |
07/17/2012 | Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure Provisions | Rule 3001, form and content of proof of claim, informal proof of claim | In re Roman | 12-61482 | |
04/23/2014 | Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure Provisions | Rules 8005, 7062(d), supersedeas bond, stay pending appeal | Silagy v Protz (In re Protz) | 12-6113 | |
09/17/2013 | Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure Provisions | Rule 9024, reconsideration, futility of amended complaint | In re Book (Mason v Clark) | 12-6031 | |
08/12/2010 | Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure Provisions | Rules7012(b)(5), 9027(b), service of notice of removal, § 523(a)(3), actual knowledge of bankruptcy case | In re Ellis (Mills v Ellis) | 10-6015 | |
02/19/2010 | Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure Provisions | Rules 2004, 7026(b)(5), attorney client privilege | In re Wittmer | 08-61617 | |
06/05/2018 | Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure Provisions | 8007(a)(1)(A) | In re Clint D. Hackney and Melissa J. Hackney | 17-62369 | |
07/17/2012 | Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure Provisions | Rules 7026, 7-37, expert testimony | In re Starr (Advantage Bank v Starr) | 10-6007 | |
07/29/2005 | Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure Provisions | FRBP 7012(f) | Chase Manhattan Bank USA-v-Rowland (In Re Rowland ) | 05-1311 | |
04/30/2019 | Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure Provisions | FRBP 9016, motion to quash, nonparty | In re Natalie Lynn Clark | 16-61558 | |
12/12/2006 | Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure Provisions | FRBP 3001(a), FRBP 3001(f) | In Re Arthur Boyd Jr | 05-19361 | |
07/26/2007 | Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure Provisions | Rule 9024, Rules 60(b)(1) and (6) | In re Hi-Rise Recycling Co Inc (Off Comm of Unsec Creds v Certified Steel Co) | 06-6128 | |
01/07/2003 | Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure Provisions | Rule 9024, excusable neglect, vacating dismissal order | In re Ostrowski | 96-63092 | |
08/06/2007 | Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure Provisions | Rule 9024, Rule 60(b)(4), service | In re Smith (Conley v Smith) | 07-6022 | |
02/14/2023 | Judge John P. Gustafson | Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure Provisions | Cause to extend time to file a Complaint for discharge/dischargeability | In re Larry Riggs and Lynda Riggs | 22-30575 |
04/26/2006 | Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure Provisions | FRBP 9011 | Rabin-v-Shanker (In Re Rapisarda) | 03-1301 | |
03/16/2010 | Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure Provisions | Rule 1014, change of venue, burden of proof | In re Alspach | 10-60525 | |
10/30/2006 | Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure Provisions | Rule 7004, motion to quash | In re DiBartolo (Evans v DiBartolo) | 06-6053 | |
05/31/2011 | Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure Provisions | Rule 7056, attorney fees awarded in divorce proceeding | In re Lutz (Chicanowicz v Lutz) | 10-6123 | |
01/10/2017 | Judge John P. Gustafson | Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure Provisions | Service of Process, Default Judgments, Reconsideration | In re Richard James Roby and Deanna Michele Roby | 16-31778 |
06/05/2014 | Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure Provisions | Rule 7037, reasonable expenses, attorney fees | Spirit SPE Portfolio 2007-1 v Paxos (In re Paxos) | 12-6112 | |
11/23/2010 | Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure Provisions | Rule 9023, alter or amend relief from stay, conditional relief, equitable considerations | In re Seniah Corp | 10-60620 | |
10/14/2011 | Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure Provisions | Rule 7056, failure to counter lack of intent to deceive | In re Haas (Mitev v Haas) | 11-6014 | |
03/06/2013 | Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure Provisions | Rule 7004, serving counsel | In re Paxos (Spirit SPE Portfolio v Paxos) | 12-6112 | |
11/02/2006 | Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure Provisions | Rule 7001(4), Rule 7003, trustee's ability to revoke a discharge by affidavit following default under compromise | In re Huffman | 04-62495 |